Saturday, February 10, 2018

2017 Wines - Chapter 10 - Elderberry

With an eye toward fermenting everything in the freezer, I went with a 6 gallon batch of elderberry this year.

  • 29# 3oz elderberry
  • 10# 4oz sugar
  • 21 quarts water
  • 6t pectic enzyme
  • 80g tartaric acid
  • 6g Opti Red
  • 7g Booster Rouge
  • 1g Lallzyme EX

The berries were simmered in the usual fashion.


This year I adjusted to target TA instead of pH. Starting TA was 1.95 and I adjusted to 6.5. The pH dropped from 4.95 to 3.4 range. I added the sugar, water, enzymes, and gave it a 4 day cold soak. The volume was too great for a standard fermentation bucket so I used the larger one, and it barely fit in the temperature control setup. I warmed it up, made the final adjustments, and pitched K1-V1116. 


The temperature curve on this wine was very steady. I started off at 70F but soon turned it down to 68F. The last couple of days I bumped it up to 72F to help it finish up.


At 1.004 I racked most of this wine off to 5, 1, and 1/2 gallon carboys. The extra gallon is going toward a port. For this port, I added sugar back to raise the SG back up to 1.030. I fermented it down again to 1.004 and repeated this process. The fermentation slowed up at 1.014 the second time, so I did my math and came up with an ABV of 16.14% and 3.6% RS. So I stabilized at 19% with 7.5 ounces of Everclear, added KMS, and racked it off to a 1 gallon carboy. I anticipate using a little oak on this wine.


Meanwhile the regular batch got racked again after a week and I moved 10l to the oak barrel. The remainder went into a 3 + 1 gallon carboys. 


Saturday, February 3, 2018

Better Today than Yesterday, Better Tomorrow than Today

This week the results came in for the Kansas City Cellarmasters Wine 2018 Classic. I entered 9 wines this year - only $10 entry fee, and I really wanted some feedback on all of of my 2016 wines. Also, some folks say these wine competitions are a bit random, so more entries gives a better shot at a medal.

In the past I've medaled at about a 50% rate. I guess I'm getting better, because this year I medaled with 7 of the 9 entries. I won second in class in two categories, worth $40 in gift certificates at St. Louis Wine and Beermaking. Hopefully I can put that toward grapes! In no particular order...

Syrah/Elderberry blend, a 50/50 blend, not surprisingly scored just out of medal range at 12.67. Judges felt that the elderberry overpowers this wine and I completely agree. You have to close your eyes and pretend you are drinking a fruity elderberry.

Syrah/elder/blackberry, 70/15/15 blend, scored better at 13.83 for a bronze. Still probably too much elderberry, and some judges felt it could use some sugar. This need for more residual sugar shows up a lot in my feedback, and I'm beginning to think this is just a personal preference we have for drier wines. These dry wines suffer in competition due to the Pepsi Paradox.  I've put at least one bottle away for long term aging, I think this wine will age well.

The 2016 passion fruit wine was interesting because we opened a bottle at Christmas (fulfilling a vow to open one bottle of each wine just before the submission date, just for quality control purposes). I thought it was excellent. Beth and Lisa noted an off odor of funk or onions which, try as I might, I couldn't pick up. Well the judges missed it too, and this wine came in at 15.33, my highest score, worth a silver medal.

Blueberry rosé scored just in medal range at 13.00, but that score was worth second in the category, so was enough for one of the $20 gift certificates. I'm not particularly proud of this wine - I bottled it early, but missed on the acid. So I dumped it back into the carboy, treated it with KHCO3, then rebottled. It was better, but I thought the KHCO3 left it a little out of balance. The judges thought it was still too acidic with too little blueberry. Fair enough. I recognized the mistakes I made and adjusted with the 2017 version of this wine.

The wine with perhaps the greatest discrepancy between comments and score was the 2016 elderberry. I got three judging sheets back, and the final comments from each were, "Nice balanced fruity wine," "Nice overall wine for its age," and "Very nice wine." So I would have expected a little better than 13.67, bronze medal range. Elderberry tends to age well. I am going to start holding some of these wines for year or two before sending them in.

Chambourcin scored 14.3, worth a bronze. There weren't too many negative comments here either, with one judge noting this wine should age well. I agree. Thank you, Bill Books, for these grapes.

I think the judges at this competition just don't like dry blackberry wine. Seems there is an expectation that blackberry will always be sweet. I went to great lengths to assure that my 2016 blackberry did not suffer from the fatal flaws of the 2015 blackberry. I still only managed a score of 11.67. Comments included "too tart" and "needs some sugar." One judge noted "little blackberry aroma." There is literally nothing but blackberry in this wine. Short of spiking it with flavoring or blackberry brandy, there is no way to cram in more blackberry. Next year I may pull off a 1/2 gallon and sweeten it to 2% RS, just for this competition.

In contrast, everyone lines up behind the 2016 blueberry. This wine scored a silver medal with 15.17. We did bench trials for back-sweetening and wound up using 40g/gal. Comments included another "too tart" along with "needs more blueberry." I made some tweaks to my blueberry this year that might help in this regard.

Finally, the 2016 pinot grigio. This was a California juice bucket. This wine scored 15.17 as well, worth a silver medal and second in the white vinifera category. I've detected intermittently a very slight off odor - one of the four judges picked this up as well. They all liked it well enough however.